- INSTALL OLDER VERSION OF SILVERLIGHT INSTALL
- INSTALL OLDER VERSION OF SILVERLIGHT PATCH
- INSTALL OLDER VERSION OF SILVERLIGHT SOFTWARE
- INSTALL OLDER VERSION OF SILVERLIGHT DOWNLOAD
- INSTALL OLDER VERSION OF SILVERLIGHT MAC
INSTALL OLDER VERSION OF SILVERLIGHT MAC
Before you get started, make sure your Mac is connected to the Internet. If you just upgraded Firefox and it can no longer open any websites but other browsers or programs can, see the Fix problems connecting to websites after updating Firefox article. YouTube is one of the most popular websites on the internet, but for some reason it still doesn’t work with Safari.
If the Safari quits working all of a sudden and fails to load websites, check whether your device is connected to a stable network. It's also possible for clients to be "broken" and not properly / fully reporting back to your site server db.Į.g.This allows you to not only fill i Close your Safari browser if it is running. SUM data is fresh but HINV is stale, or, the reverse could be true) These schedules can cause variance in the data/reporting (e.g. how often do your clients perform machine policy + SUM detection/re-evaluation + HINV. It also depends upon your configuration for schedules, e.g. So, if you have a mixture of, say, Win7, Win8.1, Win10, and, if you are looking at SUM reports and also looking at SWD reports or AI reports or similar - these can/will have different data sources.
INSTALL OLDER VERSION OF SILVERLIGHT SOFTWARE
Software Updates Management, uses the WUAgent to perform detection, and the CM client reports back to your site server db.īut HINV and AI will also report overlapping data sometimes, since MSFT may classify Silverlight as an application (it is not included with Windows OS, depending upon which OS you are using on your clients). Hmm, another thought for you to consider I have did this just to eliminate this possibility, but still, I don't see how the installation process is involved in the targeting of workstations, that have old versions and should receive a patch. Anyway, installationĮnded successfully and Silverlight got updated this way.Īs a temporary workaround, we deploy packages with installers downloaded from MS website to computers with the old version. I did this because logically, installer should return an error too, if there is something wrong.
INSTALL OLDER VERSION OF SILVERLIGHT DOWNLOAD
I have tried to upate Silverlight on affected machine by going to MS download website and running the installer downloaded from that site. There are no failed installations reported either.
INSTALL OLDER VERSION OF SILVERLIGHT PATCH
How is the installation process and result connected to my issue? Computers with old version are not targeted by WSUS as points of patch distribution. This surely belongs here - SCCM only takes care of the configuration comfort. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact Steven, Steven Lee Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
INSTALL OLDER VERSION OF SILVERLIGHT INSTALL
Have you tried to install the update manually on these clients? Maybe a maunually installation may give some additional information.Īlso, you may try to reset the Windows Update component on the clients with this issue:īesides, if SCCM is involved, SCCM forum may be more suitable for the question. >Why isn't the rest of the computers targeted by new patch of Silverlight even though they have older version of Silverlight? I hope, that this post will not embarrass me. Why isn't the rest of the computers targeted by new patch of Silverlight even though they have older version of Silverlight? Then I go and pull report with criteria that returns computers with the old version. It shows good compliance and there are about 14 machines left, that have not
1874Īs a proof, that this is an issue, I deploy this patch and wait for about a week, then I pull out report ID 280 in SCCM on patch deployment I use for deploying to all machines. The number of computers, that get reported with old version is higher. I run a report with criteria that returns computers with version, that should be updated. There is a new Silverlight patch, that has Required = 1256 Number of "Required" doesn't match reality. When I pull out search for patches, I can see number of required machines on each patch. I do it through SCCM, where I have everyting setup - search folders, deployment lists. I am in charge of deploying patches to my client with approx 3600 workstations (servers excluded from that number) in their infrastructure.
0 kommentar(er)
